Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Sid is a 15-year old sophomore at East High School.He purchases a computer at a local store for a computer class,but wants to return it after using it for a couple of weeks because his classmates have nicer computers than his and he wants to get one of the better models.He did not misrepresent his age.Which of the following statements is correct?


A) Sid cannot return the computer because he ratified the contract by using the computer.
B) Sid cannot return the computer but be liable for only its fair value if the computer is considered to be a necessary.
C) Sid cannot return the computer because Sid should not have entered a contract as a minor, and because he did, he will be treated as an adult.
D) Sid can be required to return the computer whether he wants to or not because minors cannot enter into contracts.
E) Sid cannot return the computer because minors are always responsible for their purchase of computers and computer games.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A contract of ________ is a preprinted form whose terms the consumer cannot negotiate and must sign in order to obtain a product or service.


A) collusion
B) dilution
C) dissolution
D) adhesion
E) corroboration

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Insane persons are liable in quasi-contract to pay the reasonable value for the necessaries of life they receive.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The two common situations where a covenant not to compete can be found valid are in connection with:


A) the sale of a business and contracts involving risky activities.
B) employment contracts and gambling contracts.
C) contracts for the sale of goods and agreements between competitors in highly competitive industries.
D) the sale of a business and employment contracts.
E) employment contracts and contracts involving risky activities.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Usury law limits vary from state to state.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Raging Waves Rafting Company takes tourists on half-day whitewater rafting trips in the Colorado mountains.All patrons sign an agreement that states in part that,"Raging Waves will not be liable for any injuries whatsoever cause by Raging Waves,whether caused intentionally,by negligence,or in any other manner." During the first hour,the guide negligently allowed the raft to hit a large rock,causing Heather to fall out of the raft and injure her arm when she crashed into this rock.Later on the trip,as Heather was criticizing the guide for the earlier incident,the guide got upset and hit her on the back with a paddle.This injured Heather's back.Assuming that the rafting company is responsible for the actions of its employees,can Heather recover for the injuries to her arm and back?


A) She can recover for neither injury because of the exculpatory clause.
B) She can recover for the back injury, but not for the injury to her arm.
C) She can recover for the arm injury, but not for the injury to her back.
D) She can recover for both injuries because the exculpatory clause is against public policy.
E) She can recover only if she can show that there had been no prior accidents about which she should have been aware to put her on notice of danger.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under current law a minor generally can disaffirm most contracts without a need to show that he or she was taken advantage of or that the particular contract was unfair.Should the law allow disaffirmance only if the minor can show that there was some kind of unfairness in the specific transaction?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

By allowing disaffirmance in all situati...

View Answer

If a court finds that the subject matter of a contract is not legal,the court will undo the contract and place the parties in the status quo.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What constitutes a necessary for a minor will depend on the particular minor's own individual circumstances.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In all states exculpatory contracts are void as to minors.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following exculpatory clauses will most likely be enforceable?


A) an exculpatory clause that relieves a riding stable of negligence
B) an exculpatory clause that relieves a riding stable from intentional torts
C) an exculpatory clause that relieves a riding stable from criminal acts
D) an exculpatory clause that is hidden in an eight-page document that all riders are required to sign
E) an exculpatory clause that the injured party signs after an accident involving the riding stable's gross negligence

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In most states,when can a party avoid a contract on the basis of intoxication?


A) when the intoxication was self-induced
B) when the intoxication was forced by another
C) when the intoxication occurred unknowingly
D) when the intoxication was forced by another or occurred unknowingly
E) when the intoxication was self-induced, forced by another, or occurred unknowingly

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Kevin overhears his roommate Donovan tell someone that he is planning to go ski-diving next weekend.Despite not really knowing Donavan very well,Kevin purchases a $1M life insurance policy on Donovan's life.Donovan's chute fails to open and he meets his demise.Kevin can collect the $1M.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a court finds that a contract or contract clause is unconscionable,it may refuse to enforce the entire contract.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts have held contracts to be contrary to public policy if they have a negative impact on society or interfere with the public's safety and welfare.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most states use the ________ test to determine legal insanity.


A) objective cognitive understanding
B) subjective cognitive understanding
C) objective cognitive reasoning
D) subjective cognitive reasoning
E) intelligence quotient

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The law has developed two (2)standards concerning contracts of mentally incompetent persons: 1)legal insanity; and 2)quasi-insanity.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is correct about contracts entered into by insane persons?


A) Contracts entered into by all insane persons are void.
B) Contracts entered into by all insane persons are voidable.
C) Contracts entered into by persons adjudicated insane are void, and those entered into by nonadjudicated insane persons are voidable.
D) Contracts entered into by persons adjudicated insane are voidable, and those entered into by nonadjudicated insane persons are void.
E) Contracts entered into by insane persons are void, but only if there is no medication that they could have taken to make them competent.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most states provide that the minor must put the adult in status quo upon disaffirmance of the contract if the minor's intentional,reckless,or grossly negligent conduct caused the loss of value to the adult's property.This rule is called the minor's duty of ________.


A) restitution
B) revocation
C) restoration
D) reallocation
E) retribution

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In order to be considered legally insane for the purposes of avoiding a contract,a person must:


A) be significantly less intelligent than the other party to the contract.
B) have been legally adjudicated to be insane.
C) have been insane to the point that the insanity was obvious to the other contracting party.
D) have been incapable of understanding or comprehending the nature of the transaction at the time it was entered into.
E) be insane at the time avoidance of the contract is sought.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 80 of 143

Related Exams

Show Answer