Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a licensee; to warn of known dangers.
B) an invitee; of reasonable care.
C) a social guest; only to avoid intentionally injuring him.
D) none of the above.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) superseding cause
B) proximate cause
C) factual cause
D) contributive cause
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) lowest level
B) mid level
C) higher level
D) highest level
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Res judicata.
B) Stare decisis.
C) Res ipsa loquitur.
D) Mens rea.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Miles actions were negligent.
B) No tort has been committed.
C) Miles committed an intentional tort.
D) Miles is strictly liable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire,which led to Phillip's injury.
B) win based on negligence per se.
C) lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
D) lose because,although the mechanic's conduct was negligent toward Marsha,it was not a wrong in relation to Phillip,who was far away.The mechanic could not have foreseen injury to Phillip and therefore had no duty to him.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) negligence per se.
B) strict liability.
C) res ipsa loquitur.
D) negligence.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 70 percent of the damages.
B) all of the damages.
C) none of the damages.
D) 30 percent of the damages.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) prevail because society places a duty on people to help each other and Kelly breached this duty,resulting in Bob's injury.
B) lose because Kelly had no legal duty to rescue him.
C) lose even though Kelly had a legal duty to save him,since Bob will not be able to prove that Kelly's failure to act was the proximate cause of his injuries.
D) lose because a reasonable person could not have foreseen that someone in a recreation area could not swim well.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) duty,strict liability,causation,and injury.
B) mens rea,breach,foreseeable harm,and injury.
C) duty,actus reus,foreseeable harm,and causation.
D) duty of due care,breach,causation,foreseeable harm,and injury.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) for past and future medical expenses.
B) to repay the victim for losses suffered.
C) to punish the defendant.
D) for past and future pain and suffering.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 46
Related Exams