Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

A defendant who engages in setting off fireworks at a fully licensed Fourth of July show is liable for harm that results from the activity only if the plaintiff proves the harm was foreseeable

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad Co.addressed the issue of furnishing alcohol to minors.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The doctrine of contributory negligence is followed in most states.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A customer in a restaurant would be considered ________ to whom the restaurant owner owes a duty ________.


A) a licensee; to warn of known dangers.
B) an invitee; of reasonable care.
C) a social guest; only to avoid intentionally injuring him.
D) none of the above.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A party engaging in ultra hazardous activity is always liable for any harm that results.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

On Monday,Travis took his four-wheeler to Reppart's Equipment & Service for repair because the steering was not working properly.On Friday he called Reppart's to see if his four-wheeler was ready because he wanted it for a weekend trip.Reppart's said they had done the major repairs but that the steering system still needed some work and they needed another few days to finish the repairs.Travis told them he would pick the four-wheeler up and use it for the weekend and then bring it back to have them finish their work.While riding with friends on the weekend,Travis ran into someone because the steering stuck and he couldn't swerve to avoid them.Discuss how a court would determine causation in a negligence suit against Travis.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts look at two issues to determine c...

View Answer

Courts have ruled that negligently retaining a violent employee is a tort.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Johnny is hit by a car and thrown into the ditch breaking his leg. when this happens it scares Jim's cat who runs away tripping Mrs.Afton. what kind of cause is Mrs.Afton's fall.


A) superseding cause
B) proximate cause
C) factual cause
D) contributive cause

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In negligence cases the courts often refer to the term "reasonable person." What is meant by this term?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The reasonable person is used to establi...

View Answer

What level of owners liability does a trespassing adult have


A) lowest level
B) mid level
C) higher level
D) highest level

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A plaintiff sues in negligence but has no direct proof that the defendant behaved unreasonably.Which of the following is most likely to help the plaintiff?


A) Res judicata.
B) Stare decisis.
C) Res ipsa loquitur.
D) Mens rea.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

One morning,Miles placed a thumbtack on the chair of the office manager where he worked.He had no quarrel with the office manager,but thought this would be funny.Two days after sitting on the tack,the office manager was hospitalized with an infection caused by the tack.Which of the following is correct?


A) Miles actions were negligent.
B) No tort has been committed.
C) Miles committed an intentional tort.
D) Miles is strictly liable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Phillip was waiting for a bus at a bus stop.Across the street and down the block,a mechanic negligently overinflated a tire he was intending to put onto Marsha's pickup truck.The exploding tire injured Marsha and frightened a neighborhood dog,which ran down the street and knocked Phillip down,injuring his knee.Phillip sued the mechanic.In applying the Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad Co.decision to this case,Phillip would:


A) win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire,which led to Phillip's injury.
B) win based on negligence per se.
C) lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
D) lose because,although the mechanic's conduct was negligent toward Marsha,it was not a wrong in relation to Phillip,who was far away.The mechanic could not have foreseen injury to Phillip and therefore had no duty to him.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under a state law,a dog owner is absolutely liable to any person who is injured by the dog.This is an example of:


A) negligence per se.
B) strict liability.
C) res ipsa loquitur.
D) negligence.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a comparative negligence state,if the plaintiff in a negligence lawsuit is found to be 30 percent negligent,the plaintiff would recover:


A) 70 percent of the damages.
B) all of the damages.
C) none of the damages.
D) 30 percent of the damages.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

Bob,a weak swimmer,ignored warning signs in a recreational swimming area and went into deep water.He soon grew tired and realized that he could not make it back to shore.Seeing Kelly,he cried out for help.Kelly,however,ignored the pleas.Bob was finally saved by Dorothy,but suffered brain damage from being submerged during the ordeal.Bob now sues Kelly for negligence for failing to try to save him.Bob will:


A) prevail because society places a duty on people to help each other and Kelly breached this duty,resulting in Bob's injury.
B) lose because Kelly had no legal duty to rescue him.
C) lose even though Kelly had a legal duty to save him,since Bob will not be able to prove that Kelly's failure to act was the proximate cause of his injuries.
D) lose because a reasonable person could not have foreseen that someone in a recreation area could not swim well.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A sports fan,injured by a hockey puck that flew into the stands during an NHL game,would be subject to the defense of assumption of the risk in a suit to recover for her injuries.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a negligence case,the plaintiff must establish:


A) duty,strict liability,causation,and injury.
B) mens rea,breach,foreseeable harm,and injury.
C) duty,actus reus,foreseeable harm,and causation.
D) duty of due care,breach,causation,foreseeable harm,and injury.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Punitive damages are awarded:


A) for past and future medical expenses.
B) to repay the victim for losses suffered.
C) to punish the defendant.
D) for past and future pain and suffering.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 46

Related Exams

Show Answer