FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 4: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 21

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

In a case based on diversity of citizenship, a federal court will apply to the dispute the law of all of the jurisdictions of the parties.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 22

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Maris files a suit against Ngu in a state court over an employment contract. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. The case is appealed to the state's highest court. After that court's review of Maris v. Ngu , a party can appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court if

A) a federal question is involved.
B) a state question is unresolved.
C) the party is unsatisfied with the result.
D) the state trial and appellate court rulings are different.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 23

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

A corporation's compliance with the laws of any jurisdiction in which it does business is complicated by the fact that those laws can be very different.

Because the Internet is international in scope, no party to an online dispute resolution proceeding can appeal to a court at any time.

Only the United States Supreme Court exercises the power of judicial review.

A challenge to the constitutionality of an executive order that limits certain state actions is

A choice-of-law clause permits a party to choose which nation's law to apply to a dispute arising under an international contract.

Judicial review is the process through which Congress approves or rejects judicial appointments.

Negotiation requires the use of a neutral third party to facilitate a settlement.

In a case based on diversity of citizenship, a court will apply

Norwest Trucking Corporation files a suit in a state court against Bob's Service Company (BSC), and wins. BSC appeals the court's decision, asserting that the evidence presented at trial to support Norwest's claim was so scanty that no reasonable jury could have found for the plaintiff. Therefore, argues BSC, the appellate court should reverse the trial court's decision. Is the appellate court likely to reverse the trial court's findings with respect to the facts? Why or why not? What are an appellate court's options after reviewing a case?

Multinational corporations agreeing to resolve a dispute through a formal hearing before a panel of experts is a method of alternative dispute resolution.

Kari and Lillian, who are citizens of Mississippi, are involved in a case related to the adoption of their child. Over this case, Mississippi state courts have

Fresh Seafood Inc. and Grocers Market LLC dispute a term in their contract. Because the parties have a long-standing business relationship that they would like to continue, they could settle their dispute through mediation because

With respect to international dispute resolution, a domestic court may enforce a foreign court's decision for any of the following reasons except

Parties to international business transactions should include certain clauses, including arbitration clauses, in their contracts to avoid added complexity in related legal proceedings.

State trial courts that are called special inferior trial courts or minor judiciary courts are most likely to have

Large corporations that do business in many states are now automatically subject to jurisdiction in all of them.

Jill and Kane, with their attorneys, meet to try to resolve a dispute. A neutral third party works with both sides and proposes a solution, but does not make a decision resolving the matter. This is

Ty, a citizen of Utah, files a suit in a Utah state court against Vancouver Sales Corporation, a Washington state company that does business in Utah. The court has original jurisdiction, which means that