Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Plaintiffs often file suit under both ______ and the Equal Pay Act.


A) ​the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
B) ​Title VII
C) ​the National Labor Relations Act
D) ​the Executive Order

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Laffey v.Northwest Airlines, Laffey filed a class action suit against NWA, claiming that the refusal to hire females as pursers violated Title VII and that the differential pay scale and allowances for male pursers and female attendants violated Title VII and the:


A) ​Equal Pay Act.
B) ​Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
C) ​National Labor Relations Act.
D) ​Gender Discrimination Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When an employer places additional requirements on employees of a certain gender, but not on employees of the opposite gender, this is known as:


A) ​leave discrimination.
B) ​sexual harassment.
C) ​gender-plus discrimination.
D) ​equal pay discrimination.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Jack and Adam were the employees of Steel Co.Inc.Both of them performed equal work in the industry, however, the company decided to give a 40 percent hike to Jack because he was senior to Adam, whereas Adam was only given a 20 percent pay hike to his salary.In this scenario, the company wage differential is justified under the:


A) ​Bennett Amendment.
B) ​discretionary power of company.
C) ​public policy exception.
D) ​Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A female employee was asked by her male supervisor to sleep with him if she wanted a satisfactory evaluation and recommendation for promotion.When she refused, she was subjected to negative evaluation, disciplinary suspensions, and she was ultimately fired.This action of supervisor can be termed:


A) ​hostile environment harassment.
B) ​sex discrimination.
C) ​quid pro quo harassment.
D) ​regional discrimination.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In City of Los Angeles v.Manhart, a group of female employees filed suit against the department, alleging that the practice of making female employees pay higher contributions to receive equal benefits upon retirement violated Title VII.The trial court held that, the department's practice:


A) ​amounted to discrimination on the basis of age.
B) ​amounted to illegal sex discrimination.
C) ​was legal under the BFQQ exception of Title VII.
D) ​amounted to discrimination based on nationality.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Wendell was fired without sufficient reason by her company once they became aware of her pregnancy.The company assumed that the Wendell was likely to be absent from work for lengthy periods due to her pregnancy and the ensuing responsibilities of parenthood.In this circumstance, Wendell has a remedy under the:


A) Equal Pay Act.
B) ​National Labor Relation Act.
C) ​Pregnancy discrimination Act.
D) ​Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which state legislation provides pregnancy leave?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The California Fair Employment and Housi...

View Answer

What is the procedure to file suit under Equal Pay Act?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Equal Pay Act is administered by the...

View Answer

According to ___________ is it lawful for women to be permitted to wear long hair while males are not permitted to have hair below the collar in a workplace.


A) ​Title VII.
B) ​the U..Constitution.
C) ​Occupational Safety and Health Act.
D) ​National Labor Relation Board's regulations.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Equal Pay Act's coverage is similar to that of the:


A) ​National Labor Relation Act.
B) ​Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
C) ​Fair Labor Standards Act.
D) ​Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An employer who places additional requirements on employees of a certain gender but not on employees of the opposite gender does not violate Title VII.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Identify the case in which the Supreme Court held that the organization's refusal to cover pregnancy or related conditions under its sick-pay plan, in spite of having male-specific disabilities such as vasectomies covered, did not violate Title VII?​


A) ​Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co.v.EEOC.
B) ​Goss v.Exxon Office Systems Co.
C) ​General Electric v.Gilbert.
D) ​U...v.Johnson Controls, Inc.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, the employer may deny leave to employees, who are designated as:


A) "employees on probation".
B) ​mandatory employees.
C) ​"key employees".
D) ​temporary employees.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Explain Hostile Environment Harassment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Harassment which may not result in econo...

View Answer

In Price Waterhouse v.Ann B.Hopkins, Ann Hopkins, a senior manager in an office of Price Waterhouse, was proposed for partnership.When the partners in her office refused to repropose her partnership, she sued the firm.The Supreme Court held that employment decisions may constitute sex discrimination in violation of Title VII, if the decision is based on:


A) ​age discrimination.
B) ​sex stereotypes.
C) ​grounds of pregnancy.
D) ​sexual harassment.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Equal Pay Act's coverage is similar to that of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When the pay differentials between the male and female employees are due to a seniority system, a merit pay system, a productivity-based pay system, or "a factor other than sex," the pay differentials do not violate Title VII.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The EEOC clearly states that sexual harassment does not amount to gender discrimination and hence does not violate Title VII.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

James and Cameron applied for the position of an assistant professor at Luthans University.Though Cameron had more experience and was better qualified, her job application was rejected by the University Board.The Board felt that as a woman, Cameron would not be able to maintain discipline in her class since most of the students were male.James' job application was considered and he was later hired.In this case, the University Board:


A) violated the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
B) ​does not violate Title VII since they could demonstrate a BFOQ exception.
C) ​does not violate Title VII but violates EEOC.
D) ​does not violate either Title VII or EEOC since gender was part of the required skills.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 65

Related Exams

Show Answer